![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
         Likewise, why would someone of Val Kilmer's virtually limitless capabilities buy into a film which starts out in a phrenetic drug-hazed shambles and continues to descend?  Kilmer obviously had nothing more to prove in this regard after The Doors. so again, what was there in WONDERLAND that motivated Kilmer to take on the job?
|
         In Director Cox's case, the answer was to be found not only in the acting, but in the concluding 'storyboard' remarks.  WONDERLAND, to Cox, was an opportunity to shake an outraged finger at the fallible, almost frail legal system, in which we see law enforcement knowing full well who the baddies are -the drug kingpins, the murderers- but are 'afraid' to touch them because of the all-too-real inability to convict.  Just as bad are the murderers who are able to manipulate the system by copping a plea for obstructing an investigation (or some similar lesser charge), and in a matter of months are back on the streets.
|
         In this sense, WONDERLAND is an 'important' enough film for Val Kilmer to take it on.  And he did so, in a grand manner.  But he didn't do it alone; the supporting cast of Lisa Kudrow as his wife, and Dylan McDermott as David Lind, and Josh Lucas as Ron Launius were equally impressive.  Add to the mix Cox's tried-and-true storytelling strategy -where we see several versions of 'the truth'- and you end up with a rivetting story  --in spite of itself.
|
© 2003,    Bangkok Eyes / bangkokeyes.com |
|
FULL              RELOAD     BANGKOK     EYES              WEBSITE  ? ? |
        ![]() |
To print this page: *CLICK* ![]() |